![]() ![]() Well this is the real power of indexed search. Just imagine how long would non indexed search take in order to complete this task… Imagine that you have search many times… Copernic Desktop Search VS Index Your Files Feature comparision. It took 0.859 second to search through 2031 books! Copernic Desktop Search DocFetcher Indexed search: File Searching: Outlook search: File content indexing: Full text search: Online Photo Editor: Portable: Reads odt files: Search in Archives: Search-in-files: Semantic Search: Shared folders: Instant results: Support for regular expressions: Accurate: Integrated Search: Windows Explorer. ![]() Appmus is a free service to discover amazing products and services. Of course, indexing took a while.Īrchivarius finished search in 0.859 second and gave me 169 ebooks containing the string “phleb”. Compare PowerGREP and Copernic Desktop Search and decide which is most suitable for you. Immediate results Found text is shown with highlighted keywords so you don’t need to waste time opening each. It is a ‘lite’ version of FileLocator Pro and is free for both personal and commercial use. ![]() Agent Ransack is a free software program for finding files on your PC or network drives. To give you understanding how good Archivarius 3000 is I’ll give you this example: Finding files that other search engines miss. That is: if I search for *phleb* I would get text files containing “postphlebitic”, “thrombophlebitic”, “phlebitis” etc.Īrchivarius 3000 searches in. I’ve tested Archivarius 3000 and I must say it’s amazing!Īrchivarius 3000 does exactly what I wanted: it indexes my text containing files and search their contents for a text string anywhere in the word. I’ve been recommended to try Archivarius 3000. How can I make Windows search find strings from any part of words? Why do non-indexing applications find text strings wherever they are: in the beginning, middle or end of the word? I tested them on only : one of my archive folder (year 2008) + one folder containing some emails (.eml) + one folder containing some big pdf files and one. Archivarius 3000 (limited to 10,000 files due to trial limit). Why do all pre-indexing content search applications (Windows search, Google desktop, Copernic desktop search) fail to search for a string inside the words? Here are my tests results so far comparing : Copernic Desktop Search vs. ![]() On the other hand, when I use non-indexing content search software such as Agent Ransack or FileSeek, I get the same results when searching for “conte” or “onte”: Copernic Desktop Search VS Conjure Feature comparision. I got the same problem using Copernic desktop search. I use multiple indexes, i.e., one for lappy 2TB drive, another for a 4TB external SSD with tons of archived docs. my tests results so far comparing : Copernic Desktop Search vs. Indexes more deeply than MS Search, more reliably than Copernic or X1, with far fewer software issues or glitches. Most reliable full text indexer for Windows. For instance, it finds “conte”, but doesn’t find “onte”. Most powerful full text indexer for the price. Those programs also weren’t able to find part of the word starting from the middle of the word. I’ve tried other indexing/searching software such as Copernic Desktop search, Google desktop search. Compare Archivarius 3000 and Lookeen Desktop Search and decide which is most suitable for you. I’m able to find those documents when searching for “content”, “conte”, “con” (as long as the string includes the beginning of the word).īut if I search for “ontent”, “tent” or any other combination that doesn’t include the beginning of the word, Windows search won’t find it. Compare Lookeen Desktop Search and Copernic Desktop Search and decide which is better. Let’s say I’m searching for a documents containing word “content”. Copernic Desktop Search Voted Best Desktop Search ApplianceĬopernic Desktop Search was selected as the best overall desktop search tool this week in a benchmark study conducted by the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s E-Business Consortium.I’m not able to find any text strings starting not from the beginning of word in filename or in file content using Windows 7 search. The independent study tested vendors on usability, versatility, accuracy, efficiency, security, and enterprise readiness and was not funded or supported by individual desktop search companies or other organizations.Ĭompleted in March 2005, UW’s study found Copernic’s software to be the most well-balanced desktop search tool among those evaluated, ranking it above 11 competitors including MSN Toolbar Suite, Google Desktop, Yahoo! Desktop Search, Wizetech Archivarius 3000, Ask Jeeves, Enfish Professional, ISYS Desktop, dtSearch Desktop, diskMETA Pro, Blinkx, and HotBot Desktop. “By having the foresight to develop and execute this study, the UW E-Business Consortium is ahead of the curve in predicting that desktop search will become a standard tool used throughout the business community,” said David M. “We continue to receive positive feedback from our customers around the globe, and the findings from UW only validate our approach to making our desktop search software extremely user-friendly.” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |